Search for: All records

Infectious disease is a major driver of biodiversity loss, but how disease threatens pollinator communities remains poorly understood. Here, we review the plant–pollinator–pathogen literature to identify mechanisms by which plant and pollinator traits and community composition influence pathogen transmission and assess consequences of transmission on plant and pollinator fitness. We find that plant and pollinator traits that increase floral contact can amplify transmission, but community-level factors such as plant and pollinator abundance are often correlated and can counteract one another. Although disease reduces pollinator fitness in some species, little research has assessed cascading effects on pollination, and taxonomic representation outside of honey bees and bumble bees remains poor. Major open challenges include (a) disentangling correlations between plant and pollinator abundance to understand how community composition impacts pathogen transmission and (b) distinguishing when pathogen transmission results in disease. Addressing these issues, as well as expanding taxonomic representation of pollinators, will deepen our understanding of how pathogens impact diverse pollinator communities. 

Pollinators are critical for food production and ecosystem function. Although native pollinators are thought to be declining, the evidence is limited. This first, taxonomically diverse assessment for mainland North America north of Mexico reveals that 22.6% (20.6 to 29.6%) of the 1,579 species in the best-studied vertebrate and insect pollinator groups have elevated risk of extinction. All three pollinating bat species are at risk and bees are the insect group most at risk (best estimate, 34.7% of 472 species assessed, range 30.3 to 43.0%). Substantial numbers of butterflies (19.5% of 632 species, range 19.1 to 21.0%) and moths (16.1% of 142 species, range 15.5 to 19.0%) are also at risk, with flower flies (14.7% of 295 species, range 11.5 to 32.9%), beetles (12.5% of 18 species, range 11.1 to 22.2%), and hummingbirds (0% of 17 species) more secure. At-risk pollinators are concentrated where diversity is highest, in the southwestern United States. Threats to pollinators vary geographically: climate change in the West and North, agriculture in the Great Plains, and pollution, agriculture, and urban development in the East. Woodland, shrubland/chaparral, and grassland habitats support the greatest numbers of at-risk pollinators. Strategies for improving pollinator habitat are increasingly available, and this study identifies species, habitats, and threats most in need of conservation actions at state, provincial, territorial, national, and continental levels. 

Colorado is home to an incredibly rich community of native pollinating insects that contribute to the state’s economy and enhance Coloradans’ quality of life through the irreplaceable role they play in ecosystems. The pollination services these essential insects provide are at the heart of a healthy environment, contributing to our agricultural production and food systems, and relied upon by flowering plants across the state. In turn, flowering plants support the state’s wildlife, add color to the beautiful landscapes that we all treasure, and provide the basis for healthy functioning ecosystems. Despite their central importance, however, to date, no comprehensive assessment of the health of the state’s native pollinating insects has been conducted. Recognizing this need for coordinated state-level efforts to better understand the status and health of our native pollinating insects, Senate Bill 22-199, the Native Pollinating Insects Protection Study, was passed by the State Legislature and signed into law by Governor Jared Polis in May 2022. The Colorado Department of Natural Resources subsequently commissioned this study, awarded to a collaborative team of pollinator researchers, managers, and conservationists. The study was coordinated by Colorado State University Extension, in collaboration with the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation and the University of Colorado Museum of Natural History, and in cooperation with leading experts in native pollinating insect ecology, management, and conservation. 

Life-history traits, which are physical traits or behaviours that affect growth, survivorship and reproduction, could play an important role in how well organisms respond to environmental change. By looking for trait-based responses within groups, we can gain a mechanistic understanding of why environmental change might favour or penalize certain species over others. We monitored the abundance of at least 154 bee species for 8 consecutive years in a subalpine region of the Rocky Mountains to ask whether bees respond differently to changes in abiotic conditions based on their life-history traits. We found that comb-building cavity nesters and larger bodied bees declined in relative abundance with increasing temperatures, while smaller, soil-nesting bees increased. Further, bees with narrower diet breadths increased in relative abundance with decreased rainfall. Finally, reduced snowpack was associated with reduced relative abundance of bees that overwintered as prepupae whereas bees that overwintered as adults increased in relative abundance, suggesting that overwintering conditions might affect body size, lipid content and overwintering survival. Taken together, our results show how climate change may reshape bee pollinator communities, with bees with certain traits increasing in abundance and others declining, potentially leading to novel plant–pollinator interactions and changes in plant reproduction. 

The timing of life events (phenology) can be influenced by climate. Studies from around the world tell us that climate cues and species' responses can vary greatly. If variation in climate effects on phenology is strong within a single ecosystem, climate change could lead to ecological disruption, but detailed data from diverse taxa within a single ecosystem are rare. We collated first sighting and median activity within a high-elevation environment for plants, insects, birds, mammals and an amphibian across 45 years (1975–2020). We related 10 812 phenological events to climate data to determine the relative importance of climate effects on species’ phenologies. We demonstrate significant variation in climate-phenology linkage across taxa in a single ecosystem. Both current and prior climate predicted changes in phenology. Taxa responded to some cues similarly, such as snowmelt date and spring temperatures; other cues affected phenology differently. For example, prior summer precipitation had no effect on most plants, delayed first activity of some insects, but advanced activity of the amphibian, some mammals, and birds. Comparing phenological responses of taxa at a single location, we find that important cues often differ among taxa, suggesting that changes to climate may disrupt synchrony of timing among taxa. 

Abstract Plants have unique chemical and physical traits that can reduce infections in animals ranging from primates to caterpillars. Sunflowers (Helianthus annuus; Asteraceae) are one striking example, with pollen that suppresses infections by the trypanosomatid gut pathogenCrithidia bombiin the common eastern bumble bee (Bombus impatiens). However, the mechanism underlying this effect has remained elusive, and we do not know whether pollens from other Asteraceae species have similar effects.We evaluated whether mechanisms mediating sunflower pollen's antipathogenic effects are physical (due to its spiny exine), chemical (due to metabolites) or both. We also evaluated the degree to which pollen from seven other Asteraceae species reducedC. bombiinfection relative to pollen from sunflower and two non‐Asteraceae species, and whether pollen spine length predicted pathogen suppression.We found that sunflower exines alone reduced infection as effectively as whole sunflower pollen, while sunflower pollen metabolites did not. Furthermore, bees fed pollen from four of seven other Asteraceae had 62%–92% lowerC. bombiinfections than those fed non‐Asteraceae pollen. Spine length, however, did not explain variation in bumble bee infection.Our study indicates that sunflower pollen's capacity to suppressC. bombiis driven by its spiny exine, and that this phenomenon extends to several other Asteraceae species. Our results indicate that sunflower pollen exines are as effective as whole pollen in reducing infection, suggesting that future studies should expand to assess the effects of other species with spiny pollen on pollinator–pathogen dynamics. Read the freePlain Language Summaryfor this article on the Journal blog.